Trump Is Turning the White House Into a ‘Branded Estate’
Original story by: Rolling Stone
Last updated: Oct 22, 2025
Ad
- Context: The article discusses extensive and reportedly unconventional renovations being undertaken at the White House, particularly the demolition of the East Wing for a new ballroom. Critics argue these changes disregard historical preservation, circumvent proper oversight, and are being pushed forward with a lack of transparency. The author draws parallels between President Trump's approach to the White House and historical figures who made grand, personalized additions to their residences.
Ad
Ad
- Detailed Summary:
- A bulldozer has been observed demolishing part of the White House's East Wing to construct a new $250 million ballroom.
- Historians and architects express concern that the project disregards the historic character of the building and may be proceeding outside legal frameworks.
- The renovations are characterized by a lack of transparency, minimal public design review by the National Parks Service, and uncertain funding oversight.
- The White House has not submitted its renovation plans to the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), the body responsible for approving development on federally owned land, even as construction proceeds during a government shutdown.
- Comparisons are made to Louis XIV's expansion of Versailles, suggesting a similar impulse by President Trump to personalize and grandly redesign the presidential residence.
- Previous renovations under Trump include gold decorations and moldings in the Oval Office, a "Presidential Walk of Fame" excluding Joe Biden, and a redesigned Rose Garden resembling a terrace at Mar-a-Lago.
- The Society of Architectural Historians (SAH) and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) have issued public letters urging adherence to rigorous design and review processes, highlighting that the proposed ballroom would be the first major exterior change in 83 years.
- The White House claims the projects are funded by a mix of private donors and settlements from lawsuits, but the White House is described as a "living museum" and "People's House," not a private residence subject to individual whims.
- The administration dismisses criticism as "manufactured outrage" and states the ballroom will increase the White House's capacity for hosting dignitaries, continuing a legacy of modernization.
- The core issue, according to historian Alexis Coe, is not modernization itself but the project's secrecy and personalization, which deviates from norms for such significant alterations to a historic and symbolic building.
Ad
Ad